Recently, a colleague in security recounted how an officer had informed him he had become a "target," prompting a reaction so sudden that I nearly sacrificed my coffee, a near unforgivable act. Labelling someone as a "target" is often less about genuine suspicion and more about eliciting behavioural cues. By announcing or hinting at surveillance, an investigator seeks to provoke subtle reactions, like nervousness, hesitation, unease, that might betray hidden guilt or confirm innocence. Ironically, the named individual may not even be the real subject of interest but merely a means to an investigative end, illustrating how perceptions can be strategically manipulated to uncover deeper truths.
In surveillance investigations, a "target" refers to the individual or group who is the subject of systematic observation or monitoring. Targets vary significantly based on their awareness, training, potential threat level, and their likelihood of engaging in suspicious or illicit behaviour.
The categorisation of surveillance targets is crucial because it guides investigators in selecting appropriate surveillance techniques and resources, ensuring both operational effectiveness and discretion.
Soft Targets: A soft target is typically an individual unaware of any surveillance interest, usually lacking formal training in counter-surveillance methods. Their routine behaviours, transparent lifestyle, and absence of suspicious or illicit activities render them unsuspecting and thus relatively straightforward to monitor. Soft targets do not actively look for surveillance or alter their behaviour because they have no reason to suspect scrutiny.
Hard Targets: Hard targets represent individuals aware that they might attract surveillance due to their status, background, or illicit activities. These targets are expected to possess at least basic to advanced training in surveillance detection and counter-surveillance strategies. Such individuals deliberately integrate subtle surveillance detection methods into their daily routines without overtly signalling their awareness. Detecting surveillance too openly could alert investigators, increasing scrutiny and suspicion against them. Typical examples include individuals involved in espionage, terrorism, or organised crime.
Overt Targets: Overt targets are fully conscious of regular surveillance attempts against them and overtly apply rigorous counter-surveillance measures as part of their daily routine. They anticipate surveillance as a standard condition of their operational environment and employ explicit, structured methods to detect and thwart such surveillance attempts. Examples include foreign intelligence agents operating with diplomatic cover, known criminals under judicial scrutiny, or individuals considered a significant flight risk. These targets represent the highest operational challenge, demanding sophisticated and often resource-intensive surveillance approaches.
Understanding these classifications allows surveillance teams to tailor their operations effectively, ensuring maximum efficiency while minimising detection risks, legal exposure, and operational compromise. From the author.
The opinions and statements are those of Sam Wilks and do not necessarily represent whom Sam Consults or contracts to. Sam Wilks is a skilled and experienced Security Consultant with almost 3 decades of expertise in the fields of Real estate, Security, and the hospitality/gaming industry. His knowledge and practical experience have made him a valuable asset to many organizations looking to enhance their security measures and provide a safe and secure environment for their clients and staff.
Comentários